Match statistics snapshot
- Parma created the clearer chances on xG (0.12 vs 0.84, Δ 0.72).
- Parma fired more attempts (15 vs 3 shots).
- Cremonese was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 0.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84Lead |
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 343Lead | Accurate passes | 307 |
| 416Lead | Total passes | 377 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.49 | Goals prevented | 0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |