Match statistics snapshot
- Cremonese created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 0.00, Δ 1.32).
- Cremonese fired more attempts (10 vs 0 shots).
- Cremonese held more of the ball (77% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.00 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 0 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 77%Lead | Ball possession | 23% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 685Lead | Accurate passes | 162 |
| 736Lead | Total passes | 222 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.91 | Goals prevented | -0.91 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Pisa |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |