Match statistics snapshot
- Cremonese fired more attempts (27 vs 11 shots).
- Ternana was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 37%).
- Cremonese held more of the ball (75% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 596Lead | Accurate passes | 146 |
| 657Lead | Total passes | 221 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Ternana |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |