Match statistics snapshot
- Cremonese created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 0.14, Δ 0.50).
- Cremonese fired more attempts (14 vs 4 shots).
- Cremonese held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.14 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 278 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.75 | Goals prevented | 0.75 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cremonese | Statistic | Torino |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |