Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Crewe was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 7%).
- Crewe held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crewe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crewe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 375Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 478Lead | Total passes | 264 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crewe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crewe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crewe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.