Match statistics snapshot
- Crewe created the clearer chances on xG (2.05 vs 0.87, Δ 1.18).
- Crewe fired more attempts (21 vs 16 shots).
- Crewe was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crewe | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
2.05Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 0.87 |
6 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
10Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
21Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 16 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crewe | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
248Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
337Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crewe | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crewe | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
5 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 7Lead |
1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crewe | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Crewe leads this block
Crewe leads shot accuracy (+129% vs Shrewsbury)
Crewe leads shot accuracy (+129% vs Shrewsbury)
Crewe leads shot quality (+80% vs Shrewsbury)
Crewe leads box penetration (+19% vs Shrewsbury)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Crewe leads this block
Crewe leads possession efficiency (+118% vs Shrewsbury)
Crewe leads possession efficiency (+118% vs Shrewsbury)
Shrewsbury — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Crewe leads this block
Crewe leads territorial pressure (+48% vs Shrewsbury)
Crewe leads territorial pressure (+48% vs Shrewsbury)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Crewe leads this block
Crewe — stronger shot quality allowed
Crewe — stronger shot quality allowed
Crewe leads keeper workload (+27% vs Shrewsbury)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Crewe leads this block
Crewe had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Shrewsbury leads (20.0 vs 10.0).
Crewe leads (38.5 vs 28.8).
Crewe leads (21.0 vs 13.0).
Crewe leads (0.098 vs 0.054).
Crewe leads (94.6 vs 90.2).
Shrewsbury leads (23.0 vs 13.0).