Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall created the clearer chances on xG (0.35 vs 3.64, Δ 3.29).
- Walsall fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Walsall was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crewe | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 0.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.64Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crewe | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 429Lead | Accurate passes | 165 |
| 531Lead | Total passes | 269 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crewe | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crewe | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crewe | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.