Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 30%).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 482Lead | Total passes | 227 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |