Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 0.71, Δ 0.56).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Botafogo held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 231 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 314 | Total passes | 519Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.57 | Goals prevented | -0.57 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.