Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma fired more attempts (22 vs 12 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 41%).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 396Lead | Accurate passes | 235 |
| 475Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |