Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 24%).
- Chapecoense-sc held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 170 | Accurate passes | 204Lead |
| 252 | Total passes | 289Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |