Match statistics snapshot
- Chapecoense-sc fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 22%).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |