Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 1.47, Δ 0.31).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (23 vs 13 shots).
- Cuiaba was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.47 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 434Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.39 | Goals prevented | 0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |