Match statistics snapshot
- Guarani Campinas fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
- Guarani Campinas held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 189 | Accurate passes | 392Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 498Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Guarani Campinas |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |