Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 0.46, Δ 0.43).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.46 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 505Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.05 | Goals prevented | 0.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Londrina |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.