Match statistics snapshot
- Luverdense fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 22%).
- Luverdense held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Luverdense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Luverdense |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 397 | Total passes | 495Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Luverdense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Luverdense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Luverdense |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |