Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol fired more attempts (10 vs 3 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
- Mirassol held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 1 |
| 3Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 160 | Accurate passes | 363Lead |
| 232 | Total passes | 432Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Mirassol |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 18Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |