Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 0.70, Δ 0.85).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Nautico Recife |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Nautico Recife |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 272Lead | Accurate passes | 186 |
| 355Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Nautico Recife |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Nautico Recife |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.38 | Goals prevented | 0.38 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Nautico Recife |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.