Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 241Lead | Accurate passes | 224 |
| 309Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |