Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 0.81, Δ 0.09).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 30% | Ball possession | 70%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 583Lead |
| 277 | Total passes | 657Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.46 | Goals prevented | -0.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.