Match statistics snapshot
- Criciuma fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 27%).
- Tombense held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 296 | Total passes | 516Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Tombense |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |