Match statistics snapshot
- Vasco DA Gama created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 1.42, Δ 0.40).
- Criciuma fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 352Lead | Accurate passes | 349 |
| 434Lead | Total passes | 429 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.26 | Goals prevented | -0.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.