Match statistics snapshot
- Vila Nova created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 0.55, Δ 0.19).
- Vila Nova fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 134 | Accurate passes | 312Lead |
| 198 | Total passes | 381Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.33 | Goals prevented | -1.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Criciuma | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |