Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 0.53, Δ 1.27).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (21 vs 8 shots).
- Burnley was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 462Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 572Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.95 | Goals prevented | -0.95 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Burnley |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.