Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 1.24, Δ 0.16).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 260 | Accurate passes | 487Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 566Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.02 | Goals prevented | 0.02 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.