Match statistics snapshot
- Fulham created the clearer chances on xG (0.30 vs 0.59, Δ 0.29).
- Fulham fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 388Lead | Accurate passes | 383 |
| 477Lead | Total passes | 462 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |