Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (3.26 vs 1.48, Δ 1.78).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (19 vs 15 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 3.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48 |
| Offsides | ||
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 301Lead | Accurate passes | 252 |
| 407Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.28 | Goals prevented | 0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.