Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (2.92 vs 2.14, Δ 0.78).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (20 vs 16 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.14 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 175 | Accurate passes | 609Lead |
| 270 | Total passes | 688Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.65 | Goals prevented | 0.65 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.