Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (0.21 vs 2.08, Δ 1.87).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (14 vs 4 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.08Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 0 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 218 | Accurate passes | 538Lead |
| 290 | Total passes | 616Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |