Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 1.91, Δ 0.83).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.91Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | Ball possession | 75%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 215 | Accurate passes | 772Lead |
| 274 | Total passes | 845Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |