Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (1.88 vs 1.19, Δ 0.69).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (86% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 516Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 598Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.07 | Goals prevented | 1.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.