Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.05, Δ 0.24).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 463Lead | Accurate passes | 421 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 482 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.