Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (2.56 vs 0.71, Δ 1.85).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 273 | Accurate passes | 337Lead |
| 373 | Total passes | 407Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 8 |