Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 0.93, Δ 0.17).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.93 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 377 | Total passes | 514Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.17 | Goals prevented | -0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |