Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 1.12, Δ 0.48).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 24% | Ball possession | 76%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 147 | Accurate passes | 666Lead |
| 219 | Total passes | 728Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |