Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (0.78 vs 0.74, Δ 0.04).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 419Lead |
| 247 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.52 | Goals prevented | 0.52 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.