Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 1.18, Δ 0.93).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 434Lead |
| 393 | Total passes | 519Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |