Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 1.41, Δ 0.25).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.41 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 208 | Accurate passes | 537Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 616Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.41 | Goals prevented | -0.41 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.