Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (2.00 vs 1.63, Δ 0.37).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.63 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 340Lead | Accurate passes | 210 |
| 425Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.48 | Goals prevented | 0.48 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Crystal Palace | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |