Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cska Moscow | Statistic | Fc Krasnodar |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
| OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| Shots off target | ||
| Shots on target | ||
| Shots outside the box | ||
| Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cska Moscow | Statistic | Fc Krasnodar |
|---|---|---|
| Ball possession | ||
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cska Moscow | Statistic | Fc Krasnodar |
|---|---|---|
| Corner kicks |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cska Moscow | Statistic | Fc Krasnodar |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | ||
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cska Moscow | Statistic | Fc Krasnodar |
|---|---|---|
| Fouls | ||
0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Fc Krasnodar leads this block
Fc Krasnodar had the edge in 2 of 3 signals in this block.
Fc Krasnodar leads (13.0 vs 4.0).
Even on this measure.
Fc Krasnodar leads (7.0 vs 2.0).
