Match statistics snapshot
- Cuiaba created the clearer chances on xG (1.72 vs 0.29, Δ 1.43).
- Amazonas fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Cuiaba was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 227 | Accurate passes | 341Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 410Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |