Match statistics snapshot
- Cuiaba created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 1.13, Δ 0.20).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Athletic Club held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.13 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 305 | Accurate passes | 350Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 417Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |