Match statistics snapshot
- Cuiaba created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 1.00, Δ 0.23).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Cuiaba was more accurate in front of goal (19% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| Offsides | ||
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 322Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 394Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |