Match statistics snapshot
- Cuiaba created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 0.51, Δ 0.59).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (22 vs 12 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 385 | Total passes | 484Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.34 | Goals prevented | -1.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |