Match statistics snapshot
- Gremio created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 1.64, Δ 0.28).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Gremio was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.64Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 342 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 411 | Total passes | 431Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |