Match statistics snapshot
- Cuiaba created the clearer chances on xG (0.35 vs 0.24, Δ 0.11).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Cuiaba was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 0.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.24 |
| Offsides | ||
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 160Lead | Accurate passes | 138 |
| 200Lead | Total passes | 170 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.56 | Goals prevented | 0.56 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.