Match statistics snapshot
- Remo created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 1.73, Δ 0.05).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (29 vs 10 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.73Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 29Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 488Lead | Accurate passes | 151 |
| 550Lead | Total passes | 230 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |