Match statistics snapshot
- Vasco DA Gama created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 1.50, Δ 0.93).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Vasco DA Gama was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 401Lead | Accurate passes | 384 |
| 463Lead | Total passes | 461 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuiaba | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |