Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 2.73, Δ 2.12).
- Genk fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Genk held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cukaricki | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.73Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cukaricki | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 511Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 592Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cukaricki | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cukaricki | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cukaricki | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.