Match statistics snapshot
- Cumbayá fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- LDU de Quito was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
- LDU de Quito held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 474Lead |
| 353 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |